Wednesday, July 9, 2008
I'm going Vegan...
So after a few months for frustration, I've decided to become Vegan... I will be on this vegan diet for 5 months.. i want to slim down for florida.. but friday is sophia's birthday and we're going out to eat.. so that is ONE day i might be vegan
Thursday, May 8, 2008
Judge Favor Austin School in a Student Sex Case
In winter 2003, was the time a former student that attending James Bowie High school, claimed he had a sexual relationship with the color guard instructor, James Scott Johnson. In 2004, Johnson was fired after the mother showed the school principal phone records between the teacher and student. The former student filed a suit against the school stating that the district didn’t protect the student after the teacher made a comment to other employee that he was “coming out,” therefore it violated the Title IX of the federal education code. The U.S. District Court Judge ruled that there were no evidences of their relationship nor did other employees knew of their relationship.
Johnson claimed that he was just being a friend to the student because the student had problems with the parents finding out the student was gay. The student claimed that they had several sexual interactions, in the school’s closet, at Johnson’s apartment and car (it was in the article).
The suit was filed in January 2007, when the incident claimed to occur in winter 2003. Even though, the mother had phone records of the two exchanging calls. The only hard evidence the student has is the phone records from 2003. The student did not have any evidences of other employees knowing about their sexual relationship.
The student is suiting the district because the “district did not do enough to stop the relationship.” At the time of the incident, the teacher was 25 and the student was 16. In my opinion, the student was not forced into the relationship and was aware of what was going on. I know that it is consider statutory rape, and there is not statue of limitation on statutory rape. But it makes it hard to believe that the student will file the case four years later.
If I was the U.S. District Court Judge, I would rule for the school to because there was just not enough evidence in favor of the plaintiff. I think that if the case was filed after the phone records was presented to the principle, the student would have been favored over the defendant.
Johnson claimed that he was just being a friend to the student because the student had problems with the parents finding out the student was gay. The student claimed that they had several sexual interactions, in the school’s closet, at Johnson’s apartment and car (it was in the article).
The suit was filed in January 2007, when the incident claimed to occur in winter 2003. Even though, the mother had phone records of the two exchanging calls. The only hard evidence the student has is the phone records from 2003. The student did not have any evidences of other employees knowing about their sexual relationship.
The student is suiting the district because the “district did not do enough to stop the relationship.” At the time of the incident, the teacher was 25 and the student was 16. In my opinion, the student was not forced into the relationship and was aware of what was going on. I know that it is consider statutory rape, and there is not statue of limitation on statutory rape. But it makes it hard to believe that the student will file the case four years later.
If I was the U.S. District Court Judge, I would rule for the school to because there was just not enough evidence in favor of the plaintiff. I think that if the case was filed after the phone records was presented to the principle, the student would have been favored over the defendant.
The Debate about Abortion
I am comment on A Piece of Pecan Pie's Blog 7, it states that Texas should not allow abortions. I do NOT agree with that. I believe that any woman can make their own decision.
There is a reason why abortion has not been abolished. It will go against some US constitution law, which Texas constitution is almost identical too. The Roe vs. Wade case was overturn. Not only that, some individuals have their own religion beliefs. Sometime a mother needs to have an abortion if their life is at risk just by carrying or delivering the child. And of course, it will be suggested by their physician.
I do agree that abortion should not be depended on just in case a woman gets pregnancy because of an irresponsible decision. However, for those that use contraceptives in all measures and got pregnant, or rape victims, I believe that the woman can make any decision they want. Who are we to judge? We all have different preference of religions and different opinions. I think it is no one else business.
Yes, adoption is an alternative decision rather than abortion, but the woman has to go through the 9 months of pregnancy and delivering the baby. It is found that mothers go through depression after giving up their child. Then, when the child grows up and discovers that they were adopted they question why they were given up at birth. There is a lot of psychological problems in the future.
Sometimes parents or the mother can not financial take of this child. Texas has a high percent of families on wealth fare and that includes single mother. Our state tax would increase.
Over all, I disagree and I think it is up to the woman's decision.
There is a reason why abortion has not been abolished. It will go against some US constitution law, which Texas constitution is almost identical too. The Roe vs. Wade case was overturn. Not only that, some individuals have their own religion beliefs. Sometime a mother needs to have an abortion if their life is at risk just by carrying or delivering the child. And of course, it will be suggested by their physician.
I do agree that abortion should not be depended on just in case a woman gets pregnancy because of an irresponsible decision. However, for those that use contraceptives in all measures and got pregnant, or rape victims, I believe that the woman can make any decision they want. Who are we to judge? We all have different preference of religions and different opinions. I think it is no one else business.
Yes, adoption is an alternative decision rather than abortion, but the woman has to go through the 9 months of pregnancy and delivering the baby. It is found that mothers go through depression after giving up their child. Then, when the child grows up and discovers that they were adopted they question why they were given up at birth. There is a lot of psychological problems in the future.
Sometimes parents or the mother can not financial take of this child. Texas has a high percent of families on wealth fare and that includes single mother. Our state tax would increase.
Over all, I disagree and I think it is up to the woman's decision.
Friday, April 25, 2008
TX's Backup Plan For Gas
According to Austin American Statesmen, California has the most expensive gas and New Jersey has the lowest price, and Texas is in the middle. In the Dallas Morning News, it was stated that Forth Worth has the most expensive gas. It is averaging $3.49 per gallon, which is about 13 cent increase. The shocking news that scares all citizens, gas price in Texas might or WILL be over $4.00 per gallon.
I am pretty sure all citizens in the United States are affected by the dramatic gas price increase. But within Texas State itself, what are some problems does Texans face? For the lower income citizens and families, the price increase is a major problem for them. According to the Center for Public Policy Priorities, minimum wage is $6.55 an hour, and there are actually mothers, fathers, students or any citizens that work for $6.55 an hour. With the financial income, they cannot afford to pay the price gas, especially at what it is now.
Of course, we look at alternative method for transportation, such as riding the bus, car pooling, bicycling, using electric bicycle or scooter or simply just walking. It brings up the inconvenience for time, it might be a handful of hassles, might be uncomfortable because of Texas’s weather and other factors that come along with not driving your own car.
I want to bring up the question about the oil fields in Texas. Do we [Texans], even have oil in our land? What are we doing with the oil fields? Why aren’t we using it? If we are not using it, why are we saving it? I do not know exactly who to turn to for answers, or I don’t even think there are any correct answers for my questions. But my assumptions are, we [Texans] are saving our oil for the future. The United States are purchasing gas overseas and those countries are charging a lot. When those foreign oil is all out, we have oil from Texas’s oil field to keep our economic going. It will be supplied for Texans to use and for other states or countries to purchase. And Texas will charge A LOT for our oil since we have a lot of oil fields.
Being a Texans, I am not too worried about gas. We have a lot of oil in Texas, and Texas is a smart state. We have good, smart officials that will take can of the Texan citizens.
I am pretty sure all citizens in the United States are affected by the dramatic gas price increase. But within Texas State itself, what are some problems does Texans face? For the lower income citizens and families, the price increase is a major problem for them. According to the Center for Public Policy Priorities, minimum wage is $6.55 an hour, and there are actually mothers, fathers, students or any citizens that work for $6.55 an hour. With the financial income, they cannot afford to pay the price gas, especially at what it is now.
Of course, we look at alternative method for transportation, such as riding the bus, car pooling, bicycling, using electric bicycle or scooter or simply just walking. It brings up the inconvenience for time, it might be a handful of hassles, might be uncomfortable because of Texas’s weather and other factors that come along with not driving your own car.
I want to bring up the question about the oil fields in Texas. Do we [Texans], even have oil in our land? What are we doing with the oil fields? Why aren’t we using it? If we are not using it, why are we saving it? I do not know exactly who to turn to for answers, or I don’t even think there are any correct answers for my questions. But my assumptions are, we [Texans] are saving our oil for the future. The United States are purchasing gas overseas and those countries are charging a lot. When those foreign oil is all out, we have oil from Texas’s oil field to keep our economic going. It will be supplied for Texans to use and for other states or countries to purchase. And Texas will charge A LOT for our oil since we have a lot of oil fields.
Being a Texans, I am not too worried about gas. We have a lot of oil in Texas, and Texas is a smart state. We have good, smart officials that will take can of the Texan citizens.
Thursday, April 10, 2008
Death Penalty: A Fair Punishment
This posting is in response to a classmate’s blog regarding the death penalty. This blog can be viewed at A Citizen's Thoughts Blog.
I agree that Texas should never get rid of the death penalty. To be sentence the death penalty, the murderer have had committed dreadful murder or murders. It is good to know that Texas does not overuse this punishment. It has been use 405 times for the last 32 years, and “there is no conclusive evidence that any of these people were innocent.”
The death penalty is to prevent more murders from happening. It is an act to make our society safer. For the family that lost their love one, when a murderer is sentence to be executed, is a sense of relief but the pain of losing their love one still continues. I think that the death penalty is one way to show that our justice system is working us citizens. Why should a murderer deserve to live if they have killed an innocent person? It cost a lot of money to provide a prison, security, guards, food and clothing for these murderers. Who is paying for these murderers’ food and shelter? Tax payers?
I agree that Texas should never get rid of the death penalty. To be sentence the death penalty, the murderer have had committed dreadful murder or murders. It is good to know that Texas does not overuse this punishment. It has been use 405 times for the last 32 years, and “there is no conclusive evidence that any of these people were innocent.”
The death penalty is to prevent more murders from happening. It is an act to make our society safer. For the family that lost their love one, when a murderer is sentence to be executed, is a sense of relief but the pain of losing their love one still continues. I think that the death penalty is one way to show that our justice system is working us citizens. Why should a murderer deserve to live if they have killed an innocent person? It cost a lot of money to provide a prison, security, guards, food and clothing for these murderers. Who is paying for these murderers’ food and shelter? Tax payers?
Thursday, March 27, 2008
Tuition Cost Increase
Dallas Morning News had announced the disappointed news. I am not excited to learn that all University of Texas campuses are going to increase their tuition cost. The board unanimously approved the new rate; tuition will increase five to thirteen percent for the next two years. This will affect independent students and students from a low-income family. One student from UT-Arlington is considering going to a college that is less expensive or a community college. Students that depend on grants and financial aid, the government have to provide more money for them.
At UT-Arlington and UT-Dallas, in 2005, the student agreed for an extra $120 a-year fee for transportation, recreation center and other services. I think it is great that the institution asked for the students’ approval and the extra fee is going towards something for the student. But it brings up the question about other campuses.
What are they doing with the extra fees? Is the money going towards the student? What does the student benefit from the extra fees? I am a student that receives no financial support from my parents and it is announced that tuition will increase; I think about the cost that I have to pay for school. Do I really want a new recreation center? No, I want to go to a University and graduate, but costs are increasing dramatically? What should the Texas government do about this?
I think tax payer pay should pay more taxes for education. I, as a worker, pay more for Medicare and Social Security. It brings questions, whether I will even get my Social Security when I turn 65. If we give money for Medicare, I think we should give a little more money for education. I know that our economy is going through inflation and that includes tuition cost. But what is the money going towards?
At UT-Arlington and UT-Dallas, in 2005, the student agreed for an extra $120 a-year fee for transportation, recreation center and other services. I think it is great that the institution asked for the students’ approval and the extra fee is going towards something for the student. But it brings up the question about other campuses.
What are they doing with the extra fees? Is the money going towards the student? What does the student benefit from the extra fees? I am a student that receives no financial support from my parents and it is announced that tuition will increase; I think about the cost that I have to pay for school. Do I really want a new recreation center? No, I want to go to a University and graduate, but costs are increasing dramatically? What should the Texas government do about this?
I think tax payer pay should pay more taxes for education. I, as a worker, pay more for Medicare and Social Security. It brings questions, whether I will even get my Social Security when I turn 65. If we give money for Medicare, I think we should give a little more money for education. I know that our economy is going through inflation and that includes tuition cost. But what is the money going towards?
Friday, March 7, 2008
Student Healthcare
In the Dallas-Forth Worth area, Grapevine-Colleyville Independent School District and John Peter Smith Health Network joined to provide healthcare to the students. JPS is the county hospital for Tarrant County in Forth Worth, Texas. As of January 16, 2008, the clinic will serve all students and their siblings up to the age of 18 that are in the GCISD. The clinic will treat acute conditions, minor injuries, give immunization and physicals. The agreement between the district and JPS is that the district will provide space and all repairs, and JPS will provide practitioners, medical staffs and supplies. Students with insurances will pay the co-pay and students without insurance will pay $5 for an office visit. The clinic is having a smooth start.
This consolidation is important to the low-income families and families with or without health insurances. Students will have access to the health care provider and it will be affordable. It is believe to decrease the number of absences. The school district spent more than $127,000 to remodel the building. The issue is not about spending or making money, the main concern is about students being healthy and getting correct medical attention. By getting immunization, physicals, medicine will help prevent further health problems and educate the students to stay healthy. A newsletter sent out to all students’ home and parents are informed.
We hear it on the news, in social conversation, and presidential candidates’ speak. We all know that medical care is unaffordable. But what have the government done about this problem? Health care CAN be affordable. I work at a family practice clinic and our prices are specially design to service the community and to be affordable. It is ridiculous what practitioners are charging for service and fees.
This is one of the first steps that all county should do for all students that are in their district. The potential benefits are keeping our children healthy and preventing disease or illness. However, if this was the perfect solution, it would have been done before and every county would have done it. There some downside to this, such as expenses, staffing, the size of the population and more. I do believe that the problem will improve. The problem cannot be solved over night nor does the solution can fix everywhere in the United States. By taking a large problem, fixing a small portion of it and later fixing more, is a great start. This small portion begins with one school district and one country hospital.
This consolidation is important to the low-income families and families with or without health insurances. Students will have access to the health care provider and it will be affordable. It is believe to decrease the number of absences. The school district spent more than $127,000 to remodel the building. The issue is not about spending or making money, the main concern is about students being healthy and getting correct medical attention. By getting immunization, physicals, medicine will help prevent further health problems and educate the students to stay healthy. A newsletter sent out to all students’ home and parents are informed.
We hear it on the news, in social conversation, and presidential candidates’ speak. We all know that medical care is unaffordable. But what have the government done about this problem? Health care CAN be affordable. I work at a family practice clinic and our prices are specially design to service the community and to be affordable. It is ridiculous what practitioners are charging for service and fees.
This is one of the first steps that all county should do for all students that are in their district. The potential benefits are keeping our children healthy and preventing disease or illness. However, if this was the perfect solution, it would have been done before and every county would have done it. There some downside to this, such as expenses, staffing, the size of the population and more. I do believe that the problem will improve. The problem cannot be solved over night nor does the solution can fix everywhere in the United States. By taking a large problem, fixing a small portion of it and later fixing more, is a great start. This small portion begins with one school district and one country hospital.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
